Voici un message reçu aujourd’hui via la liste de diffusion OpenBSD :
Return-Path: <owner-security-announce+M96@openbsd.org>
X-Original-To: xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-To: xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from shear.ucar.edu (lists.openbsd.org [192.43.244.163])
by xxxxxxxxxxx (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13785174A
for <xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:37:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from openbsd.org (localhost.ucar.edu [127.0.0.1])
by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBF0vKWR008926;
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:57:20 -0700 (MST)
Received: from shear.ucar.edu (localhost.ucar.edu [127.0.0.1])
by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBF0qUgX012766
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <security-announce@openbsd.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:52:30 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBF0qUaw015893;
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:52:30 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (cvs.openbsd.org [199.185.137.3])
by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBELIRZ7022282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <tech@shear.ucar.edu>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:18:27 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cvs.openbsd.org (8.14.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id oBELIRnH002826
for <tech>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:18:27 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <201012142118.oBELIRnH002826@cvs.openbsd.org>
To: security-announce@openbsd.org
Subject: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:18:27 -0700
From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@openbsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:security-announce-owner@openbsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:security-announce@openbsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@openbsd.org?body=sub%20security-announce>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@openbsd.org?body=unsub%20security-announce>
X-Loop: security-announce@openbsd.org
Precedence: list
Sender: owner-security-announce@openbsd.org
I have received a mail regarding the early development of the OpenBSD
IPSEC stack. It is alleged that some ex-developers (and the company
they worked for) accepted US government money to put backdoors into
our network stack, in particular the IPSEC stack. Around 2000-2001.
Since we had the first IPSEC stack available for free, large parts of
the code are now found in many other projects/products. Over 10
years, the IPSEC code has gone through many changes and fixes, so it
is unclear what the true impact of these allegations are.
The mail came in privately from a person I have not talked to for
nearly 10 years. I refuse to become part of such a conspiracy, and
will not be talking to Gregory Perry about this. Therefore I am
making it public so that
(a) those who use the code can audit it for these problems,
(b) those that are angry at the story can take other actions,
(c) if it is not true, those who are being accused can defend themselves.
Of course I don't like it when my private mail is forwarded. However
the "little ethic" of a private mail being forwarded is much smaller
than the "big ethic" of government paying companies to pay open source
developers (a member of a community-of-friends) to insert
privacy-invading holes in software.
----
From: Gregory Perry <Gregory.Perry@GoVirtual.tv>
To: "deraadt@openbsd.org" <deraadt@openbsd.org>
Subject: OpenBSD Crypto Framework
Thread-Topic: OpenBSD Crypto Framework
Thread-Index: AcuZjuF6cT4gcSmqQv+Fo3/+2m80eg==
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:55:25 +0000
Message-ID: <8D3222F9EB68474DA381831A120B1023019AC034@mbx021-e2-nj-5.exch021.domain.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Status: RO
Hello Theo,
Long time no talk. If you will recall, a while back I was the CTO at
NETSEC and arranged funding and donations for the OpenBSD Crypto
Framework. At that same time I also did some consulting for the FBI,
for their GSA Technical Support Center, which was a cryptologic
reverse engineering project aimed at backdooring and implementing key
escrow mechanisms for smart card and other hardware-based computing
technologies.
My NDA with the FBI has recently expired, and I wanted to make you
aware of the fact that the FBI implemented a number of backdoors and
side channel key leaking mechanisms into the OCF, for the express
purpose of monitoring the site to site VPN encryption system
implemented by EOUSA, the parent organization to the FBI. Jason
Wright and several other developers were responsible for those
backdoors, and you would be well advised to review any and all code
commits by Wright as well as the other developers he worked with
originating from NETSEC.
This is also probably the reason why you lost your DARPA funding, they
more than likely caught wind of the fact that those backdoors were
present and didn't want to create any derivative products based upon
the same.
This is also why several inside FBI folks have been recently
advocating the use of OpenBSD for VPN and firewalling implementations
in virtualized environments, for example Scott Lowe is a well
respected author in virtualization circles who also happens top be on
the FBI payroll, and who has also recently published several tutorials
for the use of OpenBSD VMs in enterprise VMware vSphere deployments.
Merry Christmas...
Gregory Perry
Chief Executive Officer
GoVirtual Education
"VMware Training Products & Services"
540-645-6955 x111 (local)
866-354-7369 x111 (toll free)
540-931-9099 (mobile)
877-648-0555 (fax)
http://www.facebook.com/GregoryVPerry
http://www.facebook.com/GoVirtua
Vrai ou faux?
Cela montre si il en était encore besoin que la cryptographie est un élément crucial de tout système d’information moderne.
En l’absence de système librement auditable sur ce genre de sujet, point de salut…
Post closed.
Fuckin’ spam!